Outdated Stolen Kidney Propaganda
Anthony Tony O'Clery
Living In Vancouver, British Columbia
Recently, Tony O'clery posted the following on the SSB2 Yahoo Group:
I heard about this incident many years ago and Anti-Sai Activists are completely mum about the outcome. The SS Hospital was not found to be guilty of any wrongdoing or stealing any kidney.
As the story goes, Mr Trimakababa Rao was the man who was supposed to have a kidney transplant. Mr Balaji, his son, donated his kidney to his father. After the transplant, the transplanted kidney was declared "non-functional, due to vascular occulation" (which means the kidney should have been removed). Consequently, Mr. Balaji's sister offered her kidney, however, the father had to be put on dialysis. Mr. Balaji heard of a "kidney racket" in Bangalore, was suspicious and had his father undergo a sonogram on August 5th, 1995 and a CT scan on August 7th, 1995. Both scans allegedly showed that the father had both of his diseased kidneys. Mr. Balaji, after finding out that his father did not have a kidney transplant, did absolutely nothing about it! After his fathers death in 1997 (2 years after finding out that the kidney transplant did not occur), Mr. Balaji made a complaint with the police and had his father's body exhumed, which confirmed no kidney transplant was done. What happened to the sonogram and CT scan? Why did Mr. Balaji wait for his father to die before he made a complaint 2 years after allegedly discovering the malpractice?
The newspaper clipping from the Deccan Herald contributes to the confusion surrounding the facts regarding the "stolen kidney". The writ petition was filed in 1999. 2 years after his father died and four years after the kidney malpractice. Also, despite allegedly getting a sonogram and CT scan in 1995, Mr. Balaji did nothing and apparently did not even submit this as key evidence. He waited 2 years until after his father died! In the writ petition, Mr. Balaji makes no mention of the sonogram and CT scans made in 1995. Furthermore, no one has produced any ruling made in this case. It has been 7 years and no one has produced any documents showing that the Super Specialty Hospital was at fault or negligent. Not even one document.
More outdated and defamatory propaganda from Tony Balogna O'Clery, the whiny pathological liar for the Anti-Sai Movement.
Living In Vancouver, British Columbia
Recently, Tony O'clery posted the following on the SSB2 Yahoo Group:
SSHospital trading in body organs.
Deccan Chronicle 5.11.99: "Hyderabad Nov 4:
Justice G Raghu Ram of the Andhra Pradesh High Court on Thursday admitted a writ petition seeking initiation of criminal prosecution against the doctors of Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences, Puttaparthi in Anantapur district, alleging malpractices regarding the transplantation of a kidney.
The Writ petition has been filed by Balaji Triambak Rao Karavande, who has alleged that the doctors of the institute removed a kidney from his body and did not transplant the same to his father....
After he offered to donate one of his kidneys to save his father's life, the doctors at the institute operated on him on April 25 1994 and told him that the same would be transplanted to his father.
BT Karavande said that his father died in December 1995 and to his shock the doctors claimed that his father's body did not show signs of a new transplanted kidney. He informed the court that after this revelation, he lodged a complaint with the Latur [Maharashtra] police, who exumed the body, conducted a post-mortem, and confirmed that no kidney transplant has taken place.
He alleged that the police at Puttaparthi did not register the complaint and that he was thrown out of the hospital when he confronted the doctors with the relevant documents. He sought compensation of Rs 20 lakh and direction to the police to register a case and punish the guilty who played fraud upon him."
This story is also reported in The Hindu, Hyderabad, 5.11.99.
Apart from the obvious fraud and theft, if the allegations are proven the persons and doctors responsible at the Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences have also, at least, committed manslaughter and possibly murder (if a deliberate intent can be established).
I doubt this will go that far considering the influence Sai Baba has on the governments in India. There will probably be a scapegoat.
Regards Tony (Reference).
I heard about this incident many years ago and Anti-Sai Activists are completely mum about the outcome. The SS Hospital was not found to be guilty of any wrongdoing or stealing any kidney.
As the story goes, Mr Trimakababa Rao was the man who was supposed to have a kidney transplant. Mr Balaji, his son, donated his kidney to his father. After the transplant, the transplanted kidney was declared "non-functional, due to vascular occulation" (which means the kidney should have been removed). Consequently, Mr. Balaji's sister offered her kidney, however, the father had to be put on dialysis. Mr. Balaji heard of a "kidney racket" in Bangalore, was suspicious and had his father undergo a sonogram on August 5th, 1995 and a CT scan on August 7th, 1995. Both scans allegedly showed that the father had both of his diseased kidneys. Mr. Balaji, after finding out that his father did not have a kidney transplant, did absolutely nothing about it! After his fathers death in 1997 (2 years after finding out that the kidney transplant did not occur), Mr. Balaji made a complaint with the police and had his father's body exhumed, which confirmed no kidney transplant was done. What happened to the sonogram and CT scan? Why did Mr. Balaji wait for his father to die before he made a complaint 2 years after allegedly discovering the malpractice?
The newspaper clipping from the Deccan Herald contributes to the confusion surrounding the facts regarding the "stolen kidney". The writ petition was filed in 1999. 2 years after his father died and four years after the kidney malpractice. Also, despite allegedly getting a sonogram and CT scan in 1995, Mr. Balaji did nothing and apparently did not even submit this as key evidence. He waited 2 years until after his father died! In the writ petition, Mr. Balaji makes no mention of the sonogram and CT scans made in 1995. Furthermore, no one has produced any ruling made in this case. It has been 7 years and no one has produced any documents showing that the Super Specialty Hospital was at fault or negligent. Not even one document.
More outdated and defamatory propaganda from Tony Balogna O'Clery, the whiny pathological liar for the Anti-Sai Movement.
Labels: aoclery, bold-faced lies, tony o'clery
posted by Equalizer @ 1:09 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home